A great deal of the woes of living in Camden can be traced directly to Adam Harrison. Is he not the local equivalent of Chris Grayling?
In matters of national government, Chris Grayling MP has become something of a laughing stock. His name has rightly become synonymous with gross incompetence, perhaps most aptly exemplified by his awarding of a contract to a ferry firm with no ferries. Some say that his sparkling record has made him a prime candidate for Camden’s next chief executive.
But Camden already has its own Chris Grayling. A great deal of the most self-defeating or downright ridiculous projects and ideas implemented by Camden Council can be traced directly to one man: Adam Harrison. Is he not our equivalent of Chris Grayling?
Cllr Harrison is most well known for his excessive zeal for any sort of project that involves placing bollards in the middle of a road or otherwise taking up pavement slabs and replacing them with more paving slabs. This has been most aptly exemplified by the great deal of schemes implemented throughout the borough this year creating cycle lanes with no cyclists.
One only has to look a little further afield to see a pattern of very silly decision making and a propensity to throw millions of public funds on completely useless projects. The so-called West End Project is such an example. Sadiq Khan designated Tottenham Court Road as a place ripe for ‘social and economic’ regeneration, with residents of Bloomsbury and Fitzrovia arguing that Tottenham Court Road was a ‘great street’ that needed to be treated as such. In response to this brief, about £30M has been squandered on simply replacing the paving slabs with granite and changing the one way traffic system to two way.
In one of the world’s most important cities the ‘Harrison Formula’ has shown world leaders how to achieve real social and economic regeneration where it is needed most. From the slums of Nairobi to the favelas of Rio millions are now being spent on changing one way systems to two way and putting granite slabs onto the streets.
Two hundred years ago, the authorities in London worked with the Crown and prominent architect John Nash to set out the Regent’s Park as part of a movement towards ‘metropolitan improvement’, creating a genuinely world-renowned open space, vital for the life of the city.
Recently Camden put history to shame by opening the world-famous Fitzrovia Parklet, snipping the red tape with a pair of office scissors to a crowd of zero.
It will surely last for centuries to come and will inspire future generations with lofty ideals of beauty and urban regeneration. And that’s before the concrete paving slabs have been replaced with granite. Just wait until the street becomes two way and a cycle lane is put down.
Enough of the urban improvement schemes. By far the worst aspect of this man’s tenure is the genuinely famous filth of Camden’s streets. From Fortune Green to Seven Dials there lie hundreds of piles of bin bags. Piles of complaints are made to the man responsible for the London Borough of Filth but he either ignores them or attacks residents for apparently ‘lying’ and ‘exaggerating’ the situation.
And only today a motion calling for the long awaited review of Veolia’s performance – a contractor which has so far failed to meet its expectations on every single assessment – has been blocked by Cllr Harrison, he instead congratulating Veolia for their performance and saying that the ‘system is working well overall’.
There’s not much more that can indicate wilful ignorance than that.
One will also have noticed the number of ‘Dockless Bicycle Hire’ docks placed around Camden in recent months. Whose idea was it to create docks for dockless bicycles? And who could have not foreseen that these docks would simply be ignored?
Or the quite incredible stories of noise nuisances taking years to be resolved and Camden being ordered to pay compensation for their gross incompetence? Yet again, the responsibility of Cllr Harrison.
The list goes on. One can only wonder why Camden’s cabinet allows this man to continue in his role when he does nought but bring shame and embarrassment upon the council. Personally I am more and more convinced that it is a part of the cabinet’s strategy to actually appear ignorant and incompetent to reinforce a belief that they are politically untouchable – after all, is that not how government works all around the world?